
The Pakistani author talks about a visit to Jaipur and learning from a younger brother
This blog is for all the fans of Fatima Bhutto &those that agree with her ideology. Here you will find articles written by Fatima Bhutto, legal pictures & constructive discussions. This blog is a fan creation & has no official linkage with Fatima Bhutto. Please click on the sign button below to help Fatima Bhutto get justice.
The Jaipur Literature Festival — which has grown from a modest literary gathering to one of the world's most star-studded literary extravaganzas — was mired in controversy last week. Its organizers hoped to solidify its position as one of the world's premiere literary destinations by having Oprah Winfrey, among others, as a special guest. But Oprah's attendance was overshadowed by the events surrounding Salman Rushdie, who was forced to cancel his appearance at the Jaipur Lit Fest, as it is often called, when issues of his own safety were raised by police reports suggesting a gang from the Bombay underworld were coming to kill him.
The gangsters were thought to have been empowered by the protests against Rushdie's visit from students of the nearby Darul Uloom Deoband Islamic seminary which had asked the government to not grant the author a visa (incidentally, he didn't need one) as he had allegedly hurt religious sentiments of Muslims with his 1988 novel The Satanic Verses. (In the end the gangsters, it seemed, were a figment of two Rajastani police officers' imagination, who, by choosing the path of least resistance, concocted the story into to frighten Rushdie into not coming.)
Further controversy followed when writers, wanting to express solidarity with Rushdie by reading from The Satanic Verses, were stopped doing so by festival organizers. One of those readers was Ruchir Joshi who has written a thoughtful, candid and angryaccount of his experience at the festival. Joshi suggested that the festival's organizers "were merely keen to get us troublemakers off the premises." Hari Kunzru and Amitava Kumar have also written accounts of their experience. (Lit fest organizers William Dalyrmple and Sanjoy Roy defend their actions here and here.)
The integrity of the festival — now reckoned to draw 50,000 people — and its long line of corporate sponsors, seemed to some observers of greater priority than both the principle of free expression and the defense of a writer and his book from angry people who in every likelihood have never read Rushdie's novel.
Oprah was also overshadowed by the appearance of Nation Books author Fatima Bhutto, whose discussion on Pakistan with historian and sociologist Ayesha Jalal drew as many, if not more, attendees than Oprah. (Watch the panel, moderated by Karan Thapar, with a cow in an adjacent lot mooing in chorus.)
But it was a panel moderated by Bhutto, "Writing and Resistance," that offered a poignant reminder of what a literary festival — beyond celebrity, beyond gossip, beyond self-congratulation — can and should do. It featured the Palestinian writer Raja Shehadeh, Burmese writer Thant Myint-U, and the Kashmiri journalist Iftikhar Gilani — all writers who have in one way or another confronted the brutality of state power — and explored the relationship between writing and activism.
Bhutto began the discussion by invoking these imperishable lines from Ryszard Kapuściński's 1982 book, Shah of Shahs:
All books about all revolutions begin with a chapter that describes the decay of tottering authority or the misery and sufferings of the people. They should begin with a psychological chapter, one that shows how a harassed, terrified man suddenly breaks his terror, stops being afraid. This unusual process, sometimes accomplished in an instant like a shock or a lustration, demands illuminating. Man gets rid of fear and feels free. Without that there would be no revolution.
Bhutto asked her panelists: Is that harassed man a constant in your writing?
The discussion that followed circled back to this question. It also examined these questions: Why is writing regarded as secondary to physical resistance? What kind of fraternity can exist between writers and the space of resistance? What is the role of a writer in a resistance movement (both Gilani and Shehadeh suggested that resistance movements without intellectual guidance can descend in to chaos).
At one moment Bhutto recounted Gilani's experience of having books by EM Forster confiscated by the Indian security forces and then paused and asked the panel, "What is so dangerous about books?" to which Gilani replied, "The danger is never in the book, only in the mind of the security people."
When asked about the similarities between resistance struggles across the world, Shehadeh suggested that it was a privilege for a writer to be involved in struggle because that experience allowed one to emphasize with struggle and suffering elsewhere.
A serious subject for discussion, but the mood was lightened by Gilani's witty accounts of cricket games played inside the Indian jail where he spent eight months in 2002 and his suggestion that all writers, perhaps, should spend some time in prison.
"I have been to dozens of book launches, but I have yet to see one on as grand a scale as this one,” said my daughter Mala Dayal as she came home from the launch of Fatima Bhutto’s Songs of Blood and Sword (Penguin Viking). She continued “There must have been nearly 1,000 guests; it was a packed house. On the stage sat William Dalrymple in white kurta-pyjama and the Bhutto girl. She is a stunner. She was very craftily dressed to please her Indian audience and also maintain her Pakistani identity. She was draped in a sari instead of salwar-kameez and wore a red bindi on her forehead. That warmed the hearts of her Indian audience. Her sari was green — the colour of Pakistan. She spoke in flawless English about her country.”
My daughter had not read her book. No one in the audience had till after the launch. But some of her history is known. She introduces herself on book jacket in a few lines printed in red:
Grand-daughter to Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto — executed 1979
Niece to Shah Nawaz Bhutto — murdered 1985
Daughter of Mir Murtaza Bhutto — assassinated 1996
Niece to Benazir Bhutto — assassinated 2007
On these four skeletons Fatima Bhutto fleshes out the saga of the Bhuttos.
Their forefather Sir Shahnawaz Bhutto, Diwan of Junagarh, migrated back to his ancestral town, Garhi Khuda Baksh in district Larkana. His son Zulfiqar Ali rose to power in Pakistan before being hanged. Zulfiqar’s daughter Benazir out-manoeuvred her brother to grab her father’s political legacy and acquired vast amounts of real estate in Europe and America, to which her husband Asif Ali Zardari added a lot more. He came to be known as ‘Mr 10 per cent’ because he is said to have charged this as commission for brokering deals between the government and investors.
The assassins of Benazir Bhutto remain unidentified. But Fatima has named Asif Ali Zardari for four murders and having himself acquitted by a subservient judiciary. She has invited trouble, as if she harbours a death wish. She is as gutsy as she is beautiful.
She did me the honour of calling on me before she took her flight to Karachi. I could not take my eyes off her. I kept gazing at the pin-head of a diamond sparkling on the left side of her nose and her long jet-black curly hair falling on her shoulders. I hope I see her at least once more before my time is up.
Fatima ends her book in memorable prose: “Amidst all this madness, all these ghosts and memories of times past, it feels like the world around me is crumbling slowly, flaking away. Sometimes when it is late at night, I feel my chest swell with a familiar anxiety. I think at these times, that I have no more place in my heart for Pakistan. I cannot love it any more. I have to get away from it for anything to make sense, nothing here ever does. But when the hours pass, and as I ready myself for sleep as the light filters through my windows, I hear the sound of those mynah birds. And I know I could never leave.”
Incidentally, I also added a new word to my vocabulary which fits both Pakistan and India. It is ‘saprophytic’, which means feeding on decaying organic matter.
Both nations rely on all that is rotten in their past.
| |||||
Author Fatima Bhutto came to Delhi last week for the launch of her memoirs, Songs of Blood and Sword. Belonging to Pakistan’s most famous political dynasty, Fatima lives in Karachi. While she spoke to HT City, we couldn’t help but notice her blood-red nail polish, a designer handbag and a copy of The International Herald Tribune.
On wearing a saree at her book launch
It seems Indians are unaware that Pakistani women also wear sarees. But the same ignorance is on other side too. We’re so curious about each other but don’t have access to each other’s nations. So when people said that what a nice Indian dress I was wearing, I said, “My grandmother wore sarees all her life. My mother, too, wears sarees. You see,Pakistani women put on shalwar kameezes during the day and sarees in the evening.”
On hating Facebook
The idea that this company owns everything you put on it is ridiculous. I don’t know why it doesn’t scare more people. And then for people to spend hours looking at other people’s pictures, reading other people’s messages and looking at other people’s friends... scary.
On the best thing about Karachi
I love our Sunday bazaar. It’s held near Sea View (beach), in Defence (a posh neighbourhood). Every Sunday, Itvaar Bazaar pops up at a place where there is nothing through the week. The booksellers arrive to sell old New Yorkers and Vanity Fairs and if you’re lucky you can get rare old books for Rs 100! While I go straight for the books and magazines, my mother looks around for handicrafts. I recently got a first edition Graham Greene. In first-hand bookshops, you only get Kite Runners.
On partying
(Laughs) I’m boring that way. Because Karachi is a bit of schizophrenic city… you know, it’s a very large city but you are limited to certain neighbourhoods… so if you go to a party, you see the same 200 people, and after about three of such parties, it gets dull. I prefer having friends over dinner.
On her writing schedule
I was writing this book for two years. I would wake up at 8 am, write till noon, take a break, go back to it at five or six in the evening and write till eight in the night. Sometimes I would be in front of the computer the whole day. The thing is, you have to write everyday. You have to sit there. You need to have the discipline.
On Delhi
It’s my second trip here. I went to Khan Market. I saw the Humayun’s Tomb. Now I want to hop onto the Metro train. They say it’s great.
Source:
http://www.hindustantimes.com/News-Feed/celebwatch/I-hate-Facebook-Fatima-Bhutto/Article1-529239.aspx
Fatima Bhutto was caught unawares. The petite author had just wrapped up an interview and gave a tiny jump when she found me standing right behind her. “Sorry, I didn’t notice you,” she said, apologetically. She was cheerful-maybe because her book Songs of Blood and Sword has been receiving an overwhelming response across India.
On her last stop in the country, Fatima was gearing up for the launch of her book in Mumbai in the evening when I met her on Tuesday. Since she wanted a decaf, we moved to The Taj President’s Trattoria. Undisturbed by the racket of a children’s party at the cafe, Fatima started talking about the book, which she calls “a daughter’s memoir”.
The book had kept her occupied for the last six years. “It’s just the beginning. The book was first released in Karachi. After touring India, I will be travelling to England, Canada and other countries to promote the book,” says the 28-year-old journalist-turned-author. At the age of 14, she lost her father, Mir Murtaza Bhutto, who was killed along with six of his aides. The book starts with this bloody incident. And the casual statement by Asif Zardari—husband of her aunt Benezir Bhutto and the present President of Pakistan—informing Fatima about his death seems to have set the book’s tone. In fact, Fatima repeats his words—“Oh, don’t you know? Your father’s been shot”— many times in the memoir.
Songs of Blood and Sword has been called “partisan”. And Fatima doesn’t mind the term. “The book doesn’t pretend to be otherwise,” she says. In fact, right below her name on the book’s cover, there is a list of her relatives who have been killed in the last three decades. “Asians tend not to talk about the violent incidents that have affected the region. These stories need to be told before they are lost in the world of reality TV,” Fatima says.
About the interest her book has created in India, she says, “People of India and Pakistan have always been curious to know about each other.” However, it’s not just her book that’s being appreciated in India.
Fatima’s sari-clad appearances at the book releases too have become a talking point. “Both my grandmother (Nusrat) and mother (Ghinwa) love saris. And for the events in India, I decided to wear only saris,” she says.
Source :
| BOOK Fatima Bhutto, Benazir Bhutto's niece has grown up amidst violent circumstances in Pakistan. Her book, Songs of Blood and Sword, comes with a sense of urgency, before any more of her past gets blurred, she tells KALA KRISHNAN RAMESH |
Closely related by blood to three famous people who were killed for their political lives, including her father Mir Murtaza Bhutto, Fatima Bhutto has sworn off electoral politics, but that doesn't mean she stays off political topics. This feisty young woman has on numerous occasions spoken out against the powers that be of the political world, whether it was her aunt Benazir Bhutto's government or that of the U.S. In India to promote her book “Songs of Blood and Sword”, Fatima discusses the writing of the book and her hopes for Pakistan.
What did you feel at the moment you decided you were going to write “Songs of Blood and Sword” ?
I had the idea four years ago, but it was in 2008 that I started writing. I felt a sense of great urgency because the same people were returning to power, with the same aggressive campaigns and I feared that more erasing was imminent since during their previous term they had already destroyed a lot of records. There was a feeling that I couldn't delay, but also a feeling that I had to do it right - right interviews, the right perspectives, and finally people were just so much braver than I expected, so many more people spoke to me.
Do you remember the first line you wrote?
Yes, it's the opening line of Chapter one: “9 September. It was close to three in the morning…”
How did the idea of having the launch at the spot where your father was shot come about?
My mother, Sabeen (whose father was also killed along with mine), and I were talking about the launch, and various places were suggested, but none of them seemed right. Suddenly I found myself saying “I want to have the launch in the street where it happened.” We had to fight for it, it was quite a struggle and till the evening before the launch we were not sure we would get permission, or that people would turn up.
Did you feel that your father was watching?
Yes, I very much felt his presence. It was a powerful moment, and sad, because everybody there had stories, not just me or my mother or Sabeen, but so many others, many of whose stories would go unheard.
What do you think the book means to people who dream of a democratic Pakistan?
It stands for the fact that people will speak, its' a huge sign of solidarity. So many people responded came for the launch, and they made it happen; without people the launch would have been meaningless. I feared till the last but that's a condition of our cities: we just don't know anymore how people will react.
There's a curious movement in the book, you let the reader catch glimpses of a pushy, calculating Benazir much before we finally see her as the woman who sat by and let one brother get murdered, and possibly let another be poisoned, almost as if you're easing the reader into this knowledge. Was that consciously done?
Benazir was a hard character for me… people knew the snippets, but I had to relive my life, I did remember her like that, in different ways at different stages. She always seemed so fragile, and when I was a child, she was still accessible, only later did she completely change into the public, official person.
What about you, are you conscious of being a “public” figure?
No, I'm always getting into trouble; most public figures develop an innate ability to withhold, but I 'm curious, I want to know and if someone asks me something, I want to answer fully.
What's your fantasy for Pakistan?
I would like to see a Pakistan free of foreign control, that doesn't answer to the U.S., that's not reeling from its proximity to the U.S, a Pakistan that is transparent, accountable, where corruption is not acceptable, a Pakistan that would engage more with its neighbours.
In a column you quoted someone saying that the Sufi influence in Pakistan would win eventually. Why?
Sufism has withstood Zia and Al-Qaeda; Its philosophy really transcends the image of men in beards.
You have said that you “try not to pay attention to fear.” How do you do that?
I'm very lucky to have a very loving mother; when you can give and receive love, there isn't much room for fear. And fear is a strange beast — it only comes when you are safe!
Source :
http://www.hindu.com/mp/2010/04/08/stories/2010040851580100.htm
History sits rather lightly on the slender shoulders of the petite and elegant 27 year old who has journeyed nearly 555 miles from across the border, with a bulky hardback to promote in India's [ Images ] book bazaars. The title of her book -- Songs of Blood and Sword -- seems incongruous with the delicate, fashionably-dressed author, clad in a black embroidered jacket and slacks, facing you, just prior to the book's launch in Mumbai [ Images ].
But you chide yourself for not remembering that this young woman has nerves of steel.
Fatima Bhutto: Daughter of the murdered Pakistani political leader Mir Murtaza Bhutto, niece of the slain former Pakistan prime minister Benazir Bhutto [ Images ], granddaughter of the former Pakistan leader Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, who was hanged by General Zia-ul Haq 31 years ago Monday.
Fatima made headlines in the Indian and Pakistani media as well as the international press in 2007, a few months before Benazir returned to Pakistan, when she accused her aunt of having had her father (Benazir's younger brother) killed.
Fatima was 14 when she virtually witnessed her father being killed in the street below her family home, 70 Clifton, in the posh, beach-bordering neighbourhood of Karachi.
Nearly 14 years after his death, from an even more violence-torn Pakistan, now ruled by her uncle Asif Ali Zardari [ Images ], Benazir's husband, she followed up her accusations with a voluminous, intense book/memoir that focuses on her father, the Bhutto family feuds and the research (often conducted, out of fear, in the middle of parks and anonymous hotels) that backs her conviction that her father was murdered.
Fatima, who is part Afghan, born in Kabul and spent her childhood in Syria (where her exiled father lived for 16 years), had the book, which was written in her father's memory, launched in March, not without difficulties, in Clifton Gardens, Karachi, very close to the spot where he was killed, with, she says, 700 people in attendance.
She has now made a trip to India, obtaining a hard-to-get visa, to launch her book in three cities including Mumbai, where her grandfather Zulfikar Ali Bhutto once lived on Worli Seaface, central Mumbai.
Ironically and sadly, Fatima's boundless courage to find justice for her father -- now through a book, when legal redress was denied -- is quite similar to the stout bravery her twice-exiled aunt Benazir brandished in 2007 when she returned to a hostile Pakistan, averse to democracy, and was assassinated.
Like Benazir, and all the Bhuttos, Fatima's strange and fateful life path was punctuated and molded by tragedies witnessed first from the young age of three when her uncle Shahnawaz was murdered in Nice, France [ Images ], and she lived through the abandonment of her mother.
Songs of Blood and Sword is not Fatima's first book. A journalist and poet, her maiden book was a volume of poems. Representing the Last of the Bhuttos, she writes angry columns, that intensify her vulnerability, on events in Pakistan for international publications like New Statesmen, The Daily Beast.
It is not surprising to realise that her destiny is entwined with this book, penned in her father's memory, and her writing. Hence, the urgency to see that Songs of Blood and Sword is widely read. Fatima Bhutto spoke to rediff.com's Vaihayasi P Daniel:
The newspapers and television are full of interviews with you.
It is just an amazing opportunity to be here. So great to be able to bring the book and talk about it. This is my third time in Mumbai, my fifth trip to India.
My grandmother Nusrat (Bhutto) actually was based between Pune and Bombay. My grandfather's father had a post here, but did not live in Bombay but he came and went before Partition happened.
I haven't (had time to find out where they lived in Mumbai) because it's very hard to move around. On this trip I am just here for a day, whirlwind. I want to come when I am not doing anything and go to Pune and discover a bit more of Bombay.
Can you tell us a bit about your daily life in Karachi? Do you move around with security? What is everyday life like in Karachi for its citizens?
I think people are always highly disappointed with the view of what my day to day life looks like. They think it is going to be a James Bond [ Images ] movie or something.
It's frighteningly normal in that I write in the morning. I got a six-year-old (adopted) brother (Mir Ali) who is in school, so a lot of activity goes in taking him to school, picking him up, doing his homework. I also have friends, who I love to have over at home for dinner or we get together and watch a movie.
The danger/safety aspect is an issue now under this current government but for most of the time that I have lived in Pakistan it hasn't been. I have made a conscious choice to live normally and not to be prisoners in our own city.
What is a conscious choice to live normally?
That means if you sort want to go to the Sunday book bazaar, you go, you don't think 'Oh my goodness, do I need six, seven battalions of people with me?' You live as you want to live, which is freely.
Certainly there are always people who will say to you: 'Oh look, you musn't go and do this thing (or that) because it is dangerous.' Well, everything is dangerous nowadays. I just was researching a story on Afghan refugees in Karachi and for the piece I had to go to northern Karachi where a lot of the refugee camps are.
Most people tell you things like '(Gasp) you can't go and if you go imagine what will happen.' But you go. That makes these things normal.
Who looks after your personal safety, and how do you stay safe?
I look after my safety (laughs). We have people who have worked with my father and work with my mother -- they are political workers. So if I say I want to north Karachi to this piece they say 'Okay we want to come with you' and they come to protect me with themselves and they are like family. So we don't think of it in terms of guards and things like that. We have to be individually careful and mobility then gets restricted.
How should the world look at Pakistan? In the media it is portrayed as a country falling apart and a country in descent. But that is how people sometimes feel about India.
I think with all of these sub-continental countries -- Sri Lanka [ Images ], Bangladesh, Pakistan or India -- everybody has to remember that we are all new countries. We are all countries that really were occupied for hundreds of years by a brutal colonial power and so you are talking about countries that are independently 60 years old, 30 years old, 40 years old and that gets left out. That gets left out. Certainly, nowadays all we (hear) about the sub-continent is poverty, violence, edifices that are crumbling.
What people don't know about our countries is that they are full of these amazingly resourceful people. Somehow (even) with the poverty and the violence amazing things get done. It is really because of the strength of what's possible in a new country.
Pakistan -- now with the war on terror you get a (solitary) picture. You either get: 'Oh my goodness, isn't everything frightening?' Or you get the other side of Pakistan that is only shared by a few people: 'Oh look, there is a Pakistan fashion week happening.' Or: 'Oh Pakistan has just had...' something large and extravagant...
But there are great swathes of people who don't get their voices heard and that for me is a big issue. The fact that we are a country, in this day and age, that has problems getting water to most of its citizens is something that should be looked into and is common with a lot of South Asian countries.
And how is Pakistan frighteningly different from India?
If I wanted to go out, right now, in Bombay, I could probably walk out of the hotel, walk over to the (Colaba) Causeway. I could do that at any time of day and be fine. I probably couldn't do it in Delhi [ Images ] because Delhi is dangerous at night. But in Pakistan, because of this current government, you know, because of this book, I can't do that, in my own city.
But these are things that change. They don't last forever. When this government goes with its excessive and enthusiastic use of violence then I will be able to do that again.
Were you able to do that before your uncle's government came to power?
Ya! Ya! Karachi is a huge city, it's like Bombay, it's a mega city. But again it's what you make of it. If you want to sit at home and be frightened of it, you can, but if you want to get up and do what you like... my brother (her half-brother Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, 20) and I would always go -- there is a bookstore quite near our house and we would say okay we are going to walk to the bookstore today, we would go together, we would walk, we would take Mir Ali for a walk, get an ice cream and come home.
We used to do this sort of thing. Our friends don't do them. Our friends would say: 'Are you mad? It's dangerous!' But nothing has ever happened.
How should India look at Pakistan? Should we not fear Pakistan? But there is also warmth between the countries that does not get translated.
I think the most amazing thing when I come to India is that people want to know so much about Pakistan.
I remember the first time I came to Bombay I was with a friend who is this monstrous shopper and we were in a store bargaining. I hate bargaining, so I was sitting there waiting for her to finish and she said to the guy, 'Oh come on, don't do that! We are from Karachi.' I thought: 'What has she said? We are going to get lynched.'
But the minute the man heard we were from Karachi he said: 'Oh, why didn't you say that?!' He pulled up some chairs, we met his wife and he gave us chai and did all these things.
People in India should know that the Pakistanis feel the same way about them. We don't have access to you, to your news, to be able to travel and vice versa. But ultimately we share the same language, we share the same food, the same culture, the same history -- it is all these things. I feel we never talk about those things.
We always talk about: 'Oh, you are Hindu we are Muslims, you are blah blah and we are blah blah' and it never translates how you feel when you are in India as a Pakistani or how you feel when you are an Indian in Pakistan.
We are sort of like cousins, who should really get along, but sometimes don't.
Does India have a role to play in the future you would wish for Pakistan?
I think Pakistan's future has to be made by Pakistan, in the same way that it has to be done here.
I think the role that we have to play in each other's countries is that we clearly see that our governments have had 62 years of opportunity to make it easy for us to live as siblings or to make it easy for us to live in peace. And they have always failed, whether it's because of American interference, you know like in the pipeline issue, which would have been amazing for our countries. Or whether it's because -- like right now -- I am so horrified to sit in India and see Pakistan and India, these two nuclear countries get entangled in this bizarre love story of two athletes.
What about 26/11? I remember hearing voices on Pakistani television on YouTube ridiculing India and its assertion that the terrorists who masterminded the attack were Pakistani. Where does that come from?
I think the 26/11 thing has been so badly reported between these two countries because the government and media have their own agenda and the government and media are always going to portray their own stories.
I remember watching 26/11 in Karachi and seeing a hotel that I had stayed in, that I had driven past (attacked). I heard friends of mine say, 'Well, you know, I was in the Mariott in Islamabad [ Images ] when it was attacked' or 'My cousin lost a relative in the Mariott.' So in fact they have not just an understanding but a solidarity.
That said, I think you are never going to hear that side of what is going on in Pakistan through the Indian media. And we are never going to hear your solidarity through our media. It is only going to come through people. For my part I never heard anyone ridicule what happened.
Any violence anywhere is frightening. Pakistanis very much feel that when we talk of things like 26/11, there are 26/11s happening every day -- you know whether you are talking about the Maoists, whether you are talking about Chhattisgarh, Karachi, riots... Both of us share these things and it is in nobody's interest to create gaps over these (issues).
What do you make of the moves by your uncle, President Zardari, to reduce the powers of the Pakistan presidency?
The fact that the president had an immunity in the first place is ridiculous! These moves of Zardari now to say: 'Oh well, as president I am graciously giving up my immunity is like someone saying: "Oh I broke your leg but now I am going to put a cast on it."'
The president, or no one in power, should ever have that kind of immunity. We have only heard this being brought up as an option for parliament (to pass). It has not yet passed, so I think we need to keep in mind that there is a big gap between doing and saying.
Also, if the president's immunity is removed, but the prime minister retains it -- is that much of a difference?
The issue of Washington is a very upsetting one for most Pakistanis. Pakistanis, like many people around the world, don't really feel this is a just war, don't believe that America should have the right to fly planes over our country.
Every time an American plane kills a Pakistani citizen it creates more anger and more hatred of the American government and it makes more people feel that this is a country that hates us as Muslims and Pakistanis. Absolutely... Violence begets more violence. I definitely believe that.
And what creates these militants and fundamentalists? (It) is that they feel that they do not have a government that represents them. When they have a government that does not give them schools and water and hospitals they will turn elsewhere) to fill the vacuum. Anybody who offers an alternative has a place.
What is the future of Pakistan? Do you think there could be military rule in the future?
I think democracy always has to be the option. But democracy has to be more than just about holding elections. Zardari was elected to the presidency the same way (General Pervez) Musharraf was -- by his own party. So what's the difference?
When we talk about democracy it has to be a participatory system and it has to be democracy from the lowest level. For example, Karachi is a city like Bombay -- a city of 16 million people cannot have two representatives. It needs hundreds of representatives for every neighbourhood and every district, so I hope that's the option, because we have seen other things, we have given everyone their chance and it hasn't changed the state of things.
Isn't it better to have benign military rule than a democracy gone wrong?
You are definitely asking the wrong person here (laughs). A democracy gone wrong can be as harmful as military rule. But military rule still says 'You don't know what's good for you so I will tell you.' That should always make it not an option.
And it should make failed democracy (not an option) -- if you have a real sense of democracy you can boot out the failures and you can still say we are going to push a no confidence motion because you as a failed democratic system or a so-called democratic system have lost our confidence.
Is there much difference between a man who puts himself up for president when he is not truly elected and a general who puts himself in charge?
Certainly in this current case we have seen them come to the presidency in the same way. So it is not even a matter of my opinion, but it is a matter of fact that they were both voted in by their own parliament and that makes it problematic.
But I am always hopeful for Pakistan. I am never hopeful for governments because governments are pretty much uniformly deserving of this vision that people have of them. But people I am always hopeful of.
I think we have to again remember it is a young country. We have to give them time. Also, things like America funding these bad governments with billions of dollars makes it much harder for people to have a voice.
You recently spoke about how you are against dynastic politics. Dynastic politics is not something any of us countries wish for. But in India's case, at present, it is the best that India has. And probably the same goes for Pakistan?
I wouldn't speak on India's case because I don't know. I obviously can only speak on Pakistan's (case). Ultimately, if you have a participatory system then it shouldn't matter what someone's last name is.
Unfortunately in South Asia, one of the things that the British legacy left for us, because they were so divisive, they did divide and rule so well, we still have countries where if you don't belong to one of two parties, you are not really going to make it. If you don't belong to one of two universities, if you don't belong to one of two families.
In Pakistan we have had our dynasties been marked by corruption and bad governance. We don't have the option to say to them to get out and go away because they are the ones that get billions of dollars in aid. I really do think that maybe in 20 years? Maybe in 30 years? Maybe in a 100 years? It won't matter what your last name is, but right now it certainly does.
Why is that you don't have a relationship with your cousin Bilawal Bhutto Zardari (Benazir's son)?
I am not going to answer that question, come on (she says emphatically with mock anger). That is a question I have answered a hundred times. I don't have a relationship with them.
Is that something you have chosen or he has?
That's how it is! We come from very different backgrounds, we have very different trajectories and very different parents!
Source:
http://news.rediff.com/interview/2010/apr/08/interesting-encounter-with-fatima-bhutto.htm
Mumbai: Journalist-turned-author Fatima Bhutto is irked.
The Kabul-born beauty and daughter of the slain Pakistani politician Mir Murtaza Bhutto (and niece of the late Benazir Bhutto) is ‘angry’ at the constant telecast of the ongoing controversy about Sania Mirza’s marriage to Pakistani cricketer Shoaib Malik.
She says, “On Monday there were several blasts in Peshawar but the Shoaib-Sania marriage was everywhere. While the media reported on random people, they didn’t tell us what happened in the blasts.”
Apart from this, Fatima is also annoyed at the fact that people from both sides of the Line of Control are curious to know about each other, but cannot do so due to complicated visa procedures. She says, “I was in Bangalore two days ago and met two people who told me their visas were rejected for going to Karachi. We all go to London, America and Canada, but it is so difficult to visit our respective countries that are so close.”
Over the last few days the 27-year-old has been constantly flitting between cities promoting her new book Songs of Blood and Sword. She made sure that she draped herself in stunning sarees for the book launches in this country. Fatima laughs, “I grew up with my grandmother who came from Mumbai and always wore a saree. My Mumbai friends got me to wear a bindi too.”
Her book paints a horror picture of her aunt Benazir Bhutto and her husband conspiring to bring her father down. But even then ‘fear’ seems to be an elusive word for Fatima, who might run a risk of irking the positions of power in her home state through the revelations in her book. She says, “Fear does not come to mind; instead survival instincts kick in.”
Born to an Afghan mother, Fatima prefers to call Murtaza’s Lebanese second wife Ghinwa her own. She even excitedly shows off her new blue blouse that Ghinwa bought for her, especially to wear while on her trip to India. Breaking into a wide grin, she says, “My mother is a fantastic cook. We also love reading and watching historical dramas. I beg her to come with me when I go shopping for fabrics.”